Angular Detector
Paste any URL and instantly see whether the site is built with Angular — with the matched evidence.
We do not store the URL you audit. Want the full audit (performance / images / SEO / accessibility + real-browser speed test)? → run the full audit
Why check this
Confirm the platform first: Framework decides what can be changed and whether it is worth it.
What this is
Angular is a full front-end application framework. Enterprise consoles and large form flows rely on it. Confirming `ng-version`, `ng-app` or core package paths lets you weigh first-bundle size, zone change detection and whether lazy routes actually exist. First-bundle size and zone-driven change detection dominate the performance conversation.
How to tell from a public page
- [Angular] Root nodes carry an `ng-version=` attribute.
- [Angular] Legacy apps expose `ng-app` bootstrap markers.
- [Angular] Script paths include `angular.min.js` or `@angular/core`.
- [Angular] Style encapsulation attributes follow an `_ngcontent` shape.
How to read the result
Confirm when version attributes or core packages reproduce; a training outline naming the framework remains only suspected. Absence can mean a micro-frontend hiding the main app inside an iframe. Kitchen-sink pages demoing many frameworks scatter fingerprints. After a hit, prioritise lazy-route and preload-strategy audits.
What to do next
Enable lazy routes, trim Zone-heavy third parties, and review CDN/protection via Cloudflare — then open Cloudflare detector. Finish the weighted pass on run the full performance / images / SEO / accessibility audit on the home page. Cite `ng-version` when negotiating bundle budgets.
Related detectors
FAQ
How is Angular detected?
From structural signatures in the public HTML and response headers (domains, paths, attributes, scripts). Every verdict lists how many times each pattern matched — nothing is guessed.
Can the result be wrong?
If only a bare brand keyword matches without structural evidence, we label it \u201clikely\u201d instead of \u201cconfirmed\u201d — we would rather under-report than cry wolf.
Do you save the URLs I check?
No. The audit runs inside the request and the URL you paste is not written to storage. There are no third-party tracking scripts on the page either, so no log of who checked what exists. Copy the result yourself if you want a record.
Can a website hide what it is built with?
Partly, but rarely completely. The HTML sent to your browser, the response headers, script paths and asset structure have to be exposed to work, so there is always something readable. Server-side code, build config and private APIs stay invisible. That is why this tool reports the evidence it found rather than claiming a full picture. No match does not mean the technology is absent.
Optimization help is available
Tell me your URL and what you want fixed — you get a clear scope, price and timeline.
To：[email protected] | Cc：[email protected]
