Salesforce Commerce Detector
Paste any URL and instantly see whether the site is built with Salesforce Commerce — with the matched evidence.
We do not store the URL you audit. Want the full audit (performance / images / SEO / accessibility + real-browser speed test)? → run the full audit
Why check this
Confirm the platform first: E-commerce decides what can be changed and whether it is worth it.
What this is
Salesforce Commerce Cloud (Demandware) powers large retail digital storefronts for global brands. Confirming `demandware.static` or `dwfrm_` lets you weigh controller forms, slot content and CDN cache tiers. Slot contents and controller forms decide how much third-party JavaScript rides along. Retail teams need that clarity before blaming theme slots or tag managers.
How to tell from a public page
- [Salesforce Commerce] Static hosts include `demandware.static`.
- [Salesforce Commerce] Form field prefixes follow `dwfrm_`.
- [Salesforce Commerce] Page copy or comments mention Salesforce Commerce.
- [Salesforce Commerce] Pipeline or controller paths leave platform conventions.
How to read the result
Confirm when static hosts or dwfrm prefixes reproduce; a press release does not qualify. Absence can mean a headless storefront consuming APIs only. Partner case pages often name the suite without Demandware hosts. After a hit, inspect third-party tags stuffed into slots.
What to do next
Trim slot scripts, optimise catalogue images, and inspect enterprise edge traffic — often Akamai — via Akamai detector. Combined vitals return via run the full performance / images / SEO / accessibility audit on the home page. Prefer slot inventories before buying another tag-manager workaround.
Related detectors
FAQ
How is Salesforce Commerce detected?
From structural signatures in the public HTML and response headers (domains, paths, attributes, scripts). Every verdict lists how many times each pattern matched — nothing is guessed.
Can the result be wrong?
If only a bare brand keyword matches without structural evidence, we label it \u201clikely\u201d instead of \u201cconfirmed\u201d — we would rather under-report than cry wolf.
Do you save the URLs I check?
No. The audit runs inside the request and the URL you paste is not written to storage. There are no third-party tracking scripts on the page either, so no log of who checked what exists. Copy the result yourself if you want a record.
Can a website hide what it is built with?
Partly, but rarely completely. The HTML sent to your browser, the response headers, script paths and asset structure have to be exposed to work, so there is always something readable. Server-side code, build config and private APIs stay invisible. That is why this tool reports the evidence it found rather than claiming a full picture. No match does not mean the technology is absent.
Optimization help is available
Tell me your URL and what you want fixed — you get a clear scope, price and timeline.
To：[email protected] | Cc：[email protected]
